{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:GLAAD
| status = gr
| last = 2024
| domain1 = glaad.org
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|GLAAD}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
GLAAD is generally considered reliable for their area of expertise on LGBTQ topics. Some editors consider GLAAD [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its uses should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[GLAAD]]:}}
{{excerpt|GLAAD|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 429#Are any of these sources reliable for covering LGBT representation on Nickelodeon?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 457#GLAAD_&_anti-LGBT_groups]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2024|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="GLAAD"
| [[GLAAD]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:GLAAD}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 429#Are any of these sources reliable for covering LGBT representation on Nickelodeon?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 457#GLAAD_&_anti-LGBT_groups|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| GLAAD is generally considered reliable for their area of expertise on LGBTQ topics. Some editors consider GLAAD [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its uses should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|glaad.org}}
|}