{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:RSPGQ
| status = gr
| last = 2019
| domain1 = gq.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|GQ}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that GQ is generally reliable. It is noted by editors for having quality editorial oversight for non-contentious topics.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[GQ]]:}}
{{excerpt|GQ|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#GQ Magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#GQ]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2019|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="GQ"
| ''[[GQ]]'' (''GQ Magazine'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPGQ}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#GQ Magazine|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#GQ|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019}}
| There is consensus that GQ is generally reliable. It is noted by editors for having quality editorial oversight for non-contentious topics.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|gq.com|gq-magazine.co.uk}}
|}