{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2026
| domain1 = hopenothate.org.uk
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247#RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2018
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Hope not Hate}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is a clear consensus that Hope Not Hate (HNH) is generally reliable for factual content. It is undisputed that, as an advocacy organisation they are [[WP:BIASED|biased]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Hope not Hate]]:}}
{{excerpt|Hope not Hate|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47#Searchlight Magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 89#Searchlight]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Searchlight Magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 154#Hope not hate as source.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#Hope Not Hate as a WP:SPS]]
==== Other ====
* [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#RfC closure review request at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC on HOPE not hate]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2026|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2018 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247#RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|Rfc]]
# 2026 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 510#RfC on HOPE not hate|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Hope not Hate"
| [[Hope not Hate]] ([[Searchlight (magazine)|''Searchlight'']])
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|247|RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|2018|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|510|RfC on HOPE not hate|2026|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2026}}
| There is a clear consensus that Hope Not Hate (HNH) is generally reliable for factual content. It is undisputed that, as an advocacy organisation they are [[WP:BIASED|biased]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|hopenothate.org.uk|searchlightmagazine.com}}
|}