{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = gr | last = 2026 | domain1 = hopenothate.org.uk | rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247#RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|Rfc]] | rfcdate = 2018 }} {{WP:RSPIntro|Hope not Hate}} __TOC__ == Summary == There is a clear consensus that Hope Not Hate (HNH) is generally reliable for factual content. It is undisputed that, as an advocacy organisation they are [[WP:BIASED|biased]]. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Hope not Hate]]:}}
{{excerpt|Hope not Hate|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47#Searchlight Magazine]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 89#Searchlight]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Searchlight Magazine]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 154#Hope not hate as source.]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#Hope Not Hate as a WP:SPS]]
==== Other ==== * [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#RfC closure review request at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC on HOPE not hate]] === Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2026|table=no}} === Rfcs ===
# 2018 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247#RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|Rfc]] # 2026 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 510#RfC on HOPE not hate|Rfc]] ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gr" id="Hope not Hate" | [[Hope not Hate]] ([[Searchlight (magazine)|''Searchlight'']]) | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}} | {{rsnl|247|RfC: Should Hope not Hate publications be considered reliable sources?|2018|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|510|RfC on HOPE not hate|2026|rfc=y}} | {{WP:RSPLAST|2026}} | There is a clear consensus that Hope Not Hate (HNH) is generally reliable for factual content. It is undisputed that, as an advocacy organisation they are [[WP:BIASED|biased]]. | {{WP:RSPUSES|hopenothate.org.uk|searchlightmagazine.com}} |}