{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:IJR
| status = nc
| last = 2018
| domain1 = ijr.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Independent Journal Review}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Independent Journal Review''. Posts from "community" members are considered [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. The site's "news" section consists mostly of [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated stories]] from {{pslink|Reuters}}, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Independent Journal Review]]:}}
{{excerpt|Independent Journal Review|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#IJR.com / "Independent Journal Review"]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#Independent Journal Review]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Independent Journal Review]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Independent Journal Review"
| ''[[Independent Journal Review]]'' (IJR) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:IJR}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#IJR.com / "Independent Journal Review"|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#Independent Journal Review|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Independent Journal Review|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Independent Journal Review''. Posts from "community" members are considered [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. The site's "news" section consists mostly of [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated stories]] from {{pslink|Reuters}}, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|ijr.com}}
|}