{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = WP:IJR | status = nc | last = 2018 | domain1 = ijr.com }} {{WP:RSPIntro|Independent Journal Review}} __TOC__ == Summary == There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Independent Journal Review''. Posts from "community" members are considered [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. The site's "news" section consists mostly of [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated stories]] from {{pslink|Reuters}}, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Independent Journal Review]]:}}
{{excerpt|Independent Journal Review|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#IJR.com / "Independent Journal Review"]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#Independent Journal Review]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Independent Journal Review]]
=== Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}} === Rfcs === ''No Rfcs for this source.'' ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-nc" id="Independent Journal Review" | ''[[Independent Journal Review]]'' (IJR) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:IJR}} | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}} | [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#IJR.com / "Independent Journal Review"|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#Independent Journal Review|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Independent Journal Review|3]] | {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}} | There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Independent Journal Review''. Posts from "community" members are considered [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. The site's "news" section consists mostly of [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated stories]] from {{pslink|Reuters}}, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters. | {{WP:RSPUSES|ijr.com}} |}