{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:IBTIMES
| status = gu
| last = 2019
| domain1 = ibtimes.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|International Business Times}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that the ''International Business Times'' is generally unreliable. Editors note that the publication's editorial practices have been criticized by other reliable sources, and point to the inconsistent quality of the site's articles. The site's [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]], which may not be clearly marked, should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[International Business Times]]:}}
{{excerpt|International Business Times|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Times and IBTimes RS?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195#Slate, WGN, International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#International Business Times as a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#Use of blogs for sourcing height in BLPs]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2019|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="International Business Times"
| ''[[International Business Times]]'' (''IBT'', ''IBTimes'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:IBTIMES}} {{anchor|IBTIMES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Times and IBTimes RS?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#International Business Times|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195#Slate, WGN, International Business Times|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#International Business Times as a reliable source?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222#International Business Times|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#International Business Times|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#Use of blogs for sourcing height in BLPs|7]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019|stale=n}}
| There is consensus that the ''International Business Times'' is generally unreliable. Editors note that the publication's editorial practices have been criticized by other reliable sources, and point to the inconsistent quality of the site's articles. The site's [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]], which may not be clearly marked, should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|ibtimes.com|ibtimes.com.au|ibtimes.com.cn|ibtimes.co.in|ibtimes.sg|ibtimes.co.uk}}
|}