{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gu
| last = 2022
| domain1 = jrank.org
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|JRank}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
JRank is considered a search engine or content farm, and is thus considered generally unreliable. Numerous concerns have been raised about copyright violations.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[JRank]]:}}
{{excerpt|JRank|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35#encyclopedia.jrank.org and "contributed articles"]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 201#http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.ca/2009_07_02_archive.html et al]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#https://biography.jrank.org]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 368#Jrank.org]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380#Should Jrank.org be deprecated?]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="JRank"
| JRank
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35#encyclopedia.jrank.org and "contributed articles"|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 201#http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.ca/2009_07_02_archive.html et al|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#https://biography.jrank.org|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 368#Jrank.org|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380#Should Jrank.org be deprecated?|6]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| JRank is considered a search engine or content farm, and is thus considered generally unreliable. Numerous concerns have been raised about copyright violations.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|jrank.org}}
|}