{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = gu | last = 2022 | domain1 = jrank.org }} {{WP:RSPIntro|JRank}} __TOC__ == Summary == JRank is considered a search engine or content farm, and is thus considered generally unreliable. Numerous concerns have been raised about copyright violations. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[JRank]]:}}
{{excerpt|JRank|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35#encyclopedia.jrank.org and "contributed articles"]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 201#http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.ca/2009_07_02_archive.html et al]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#https://biography.jrank.org]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 368#Jrank.org]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380#Should Jrank.org be deprecated?]]
=== Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}} === Rfcs === ''No Rfcs for this source.'' ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gu" id="JRank" | JRank | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}} | [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 35#encyclopedia.jrank.org and "contributed articles"|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 201#http://thedevilanddanvojir.blogspot.ca/2009_07_02_archive.html et al|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263#https://biography.jrank.org|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 368#Jrank.org|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 380#Should Jrank.org be deprecated?|6]] | {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}} | JRank is considered a search engine or content farm, and is thus considered generally unreliable. Numerous concerns have been raised about copyright violations. | {{WP:RSPUSES|jrank.org}} |}