<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2023
 | domain1		= lapatilla.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 415#RfC: Reliability of La Patilla|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2023

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|La Patilla}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
''La Patilla'' is considered marginally reliable as a news source covering Venezuela, with several additional considerations. Aggregated content should not be used at all. Avoid referencing articles on ''La Patilla'' that themselves reference unreliable sources, as editors have concerns about editorial oversight in such cases. Editors note a clear [[WP:BIASED|political bias]], be extremely cautious in referencing coverage of politics. Some editors note that the bias may also affect choice of topics. Avoid use in [[WP:GS|contentious topics]], e.g. COVID-19. Avoid for controversial [[WP:BLP]] claims.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[La Patilla]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|La Patilla|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[Talk:La Patilla#RfC: Reliability of La Patilla]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2023|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2023 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 415#RfC: Reliability of La Patilla|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="La Patilla"
| data-sort-value="Patilla" | ''[[La Patilla]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|415|RfC: Reliability of La Patilla|2023|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| ''La Patilla'' is considered marginally reliable as a news source covering Venezuela, with several additional considerations. Aggregated content should not be used at all. Avoid referencing articles on ''La Patilla'' that themselves reference unreliable sources, as editors have concerns about editorial oversight in such cases. Editors note a clear [[WP:BIASED|political bias]], be extremely cautious in referencing coverage of politics. Some editors note that the bias may also affect choice of topics. Avoid use in [[WP:GS|contentious topics]], e.g. COVID-19. Avoid for controversial [[WP:BLP]] claims.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|lapatilla.com}}
|}