{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:LATIMES
| status = gr
| last = 2023
| domain1 = latimes.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Los Angeles Times}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
Most editors consider the ''Los Angeles Times'' generally reliable. Refer to [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] for the newspaper's blog.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Los Angeles Times]]:}}
{{excerpt|Los Angeles Times|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 399#LA Times in Chloe Cole article in regards to the Kaiser lawsuit]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2023|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Los Angeles Times"
| ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' (''L.A. Times'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:LATIMES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
|
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| Most editors consider the ''Los Angeles Times'' generally reliable. Refer to [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] for the newspaper's blog.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|latimes.com}}
|}