<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:MASHABLE
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2021
 | domain1		= mashable.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 334#Mashable|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2021

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Mashable}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
In a 2021 RfC, editors achieved a consensus that while non-sponsored content from Mashable is generally fine, Mashable tends towards less formal writing and is geared at a particular niche (tech news and pop culture). As such, non-sponsored content should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially if the subject matter is outside of Mashable's usual focus.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Mashable]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Mashable|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#Techblogs]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16#Blogs?]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 41#Mashable.com as a reference for Facebook]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 88#Blogs as sources]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Request: RS check on BLP]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 264#Reliability of sources that put affiliate links in their reviews]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 334#Mashable|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Mashable"
| [[Mashable]] (non-sponsored content) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:MASHABLE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|334|Mashable|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| In a 2021 RfC, editors achieved a consensus that while non-sponsored content from Mashable is generally fine, Mashable tends towards less formal writing and is geared at a particular niche (tech news and pop culture). As such, non-sponsored content should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially if the subject matter is outside of Mashable's usual focus.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|mashable.com}}
|}