<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:NATGEO
 | status		= gr
 | last			= 2023
 | domain1		= nationalgeographic.com

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|National Geographic}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''National Geographic'' is generally reliable. For coverage by ''National Geographic'' of [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] topics and ideas, [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] should be considered.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[National Geographic]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|National Geographic|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#National Geographic]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#National Geographic website, Krampus, and Hel]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#National Geographic and Adam Weishaupt (the Illuminati guy)]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#National Geographic]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2023|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
</div>
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="National Geographic"
| ''[[National Geographic]]'' <small>(''The National Geographic Magazine'', ''Nat Geo'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:NATGEO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#National Geographic|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#National Geographic website, Krampus, and Hel|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#National Geographic and Adam Weishaupt (the Illuminati guy)|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#National Geographic|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is consensus that ''National Geographic'' is generally reliable. For coverage by ''National Geographic'' of [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] topics and ideas, [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] should be considered.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|nationalgeographic.com}}
|}