{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2020
| domain1 = newslaundry.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 296#Newslaundry on OpIndia|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2020
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Newslaundry}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that Newslaundry is generally reliable. Some editors have expressed concerns regarding possible bias in its political narratives and reporting on rival publications; in cases where this could reasonably apply, attribution is recommended, and sufficient.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Newslaundry]]:}}
{{excerpt|Newslaundry|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2020 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 296#Newslaundry on OpIndia|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Newslaundry"
| [[Newslaundry]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|296|Newslaundry on OpIndia|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is consensus that Newslaundry is generally reliable. Some editors have expressed concerns regarding possible bias in its political narratives and reporting on rival publications; in cases where this could reasonably apply, attribution is recommended, and sufficient.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|newslaundry.com}}
|}