{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:OPINDIA
| status = gu
| last = 2020
| domain1 = opindia.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|OpIndia}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
Due to persistent abuse, OpIndia is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[WT:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. OpIndia is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. OpIndia was rejected by the {{pslink|International Fact-Checking Network}} when it applied for accreditation in 2019. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] OpIndia. Editors consider the site [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. OpIndia has directly attacked and [[Doxing|doxed]] Wikipedia editors who edit India-related articles. Posting or linking to another editor's personal information is prohibited under the [[WP:OUTING|outing policy]], unless the editor is voluntarily disclosing the information on Wikipedia. Editors who are subject to legal risks due to their activity on Wikipedia may [[:m:Legal/Legal Policies#Defense of Contributors|request assistance from the Wikimedia Foundation]], although support is not guaranteed. ''See also: {{pslink|Swarajya}}.''
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[OpIndia]]:}}
{{excerpt|OpIndia|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Scroll, OpIndia, The Wire, The Quint, The Print, DailyO, postcardnews, rightlog etc.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-b" id="OpIndia"
| [[OpIndia]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:OPINDIA}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu|b=y}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Scroll, OpIndia, The Wire, The Quint, The Print, DailyO, postcardnews, rightlog etc.|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020|stale=n}}
| Due to persistent abuse, OpIndia is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[WT:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. OpIndia is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. OpIndia was rejected by the {{pslink|International Fact-Checking Network}} when it applied for accreditation in 2019. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] OpIndia. Editors consider the site [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. OpIndia has directly attacked and [[Doxing|doxed]] Wikipedia editors who edit India-related articles. Posting or linking to another editor's personal information is prohibited under the [[WP:OUTING|outing policy]], unless the editor is voluntarily disclosing the information on Wikipedia. Editors who are subject to legal risks due to their activity on Wikipedia may [[:m:Legal/Legal Policies#Defense of Contributors|request assistance from the Wikimedia Foundation]], although support is not guaranteed. ''See also: {{pslink|Swarajya}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|opindia.com|opindia.in}}
|}