{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:PEOPLEMAG
| status = gr
| last = 2022
| domain1 = people.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 157#RfC: Is People magazine a reliable source for BLPs?|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2013
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|People (magazine)}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''People'' magazine can be a reliable source in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]], but the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented with a stronger source.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[People (magazine)]]:}}
{{excerpt|People (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Request: RS check on BLP]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 361#Demote People magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 387#People Magazine reliability?]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2013 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 157#RfC: Is People magazine a reliable source for BLPs?|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="People"
| ''[[People (magazine)|People]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:PEOPLEMAG}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|157|RfC: Is People magazine a reliable source for BLPs?|2013|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| There is consensus that ''People'' magazine can be a reliable source in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]], but the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented with a stronger source.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|people.com}}
|}