{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = gr | last = 2015 | domain1 = playboy.com }} {{WP:RSPIntro|Playboy}} __TOC__ == Summary == There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Playboy]]:}}
{{excerpt|Playboy|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com]]
=== Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2015|table=no}} === Rfcs === ''No Rfcs for this source.'' ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gr" id="Playboy" | ''[[Playboy]]'' | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}} | [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com|8]] | {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}} | There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking. | {{WP:RSPUSES|playboy.com}} |}