{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2015
| domain1 = playboy.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Playboy}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Playboy]]:}}
{{excerpt|Playboy|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2015|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Playboy"
| ''[[Playboy]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com|8]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}}
| There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|playboy.com}}
|}