{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:PROPUBLICA
| status = gr
| last = 2019
| domain1 = propublica.org
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 279#RfC: "ProPublica" (October)|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2019
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|ProPublica}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is a strong consensus that ProPublica is generally reliable for all purposes because it has an excellent reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, is widely cited by reliable sources, and has received multiple [[Pulitzer Prize]]s.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[ProPublica]]:}}
{{excerpt|ProPublica|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#News organizations using a third-party fact checking service]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2019|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2019 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 279#RfC: "ProPublica" (October)|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="ProPublica"
| [[ProPublica]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:PROPUBLICA}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|279|RfC: "ProPublica" (October)|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019}}
| There is a strong consensus that ProPublica is generally reliable for all purposes because it has an excellent reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, is widely cited by reliable sources, and has received multiple [[Pulitzer Prize]]s.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|propublica.org}}
|}