<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:QUILLETTE
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2021
 | domain1		= quillette.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 314#Quillette|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2020

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Quillette}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''Quillette'' is generally unreliable for facts, with non-trivial minorities arguing for either full deprecation or "considerations apply". ''Quillette'' is primarily a publication of opinion, and thus actual usage in articles will usually be a question of whether or not it is [[WP:DUE]] for an attributed opinion rather than whether it is reliable for a factual claim.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Quillette]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Quillette|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Is Quillette and Spencer Case a reliable source?]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#"Greviance Studies" scandal – use of peer-reviewed journals as RS]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Quillette]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Expert opinion on Quilette]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2020 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 314#Quillette|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Quillette"
| ''[[Quillette]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:QUILLETTE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|314|Quillette|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''Quillette'' is generally unreliable for facts, with non-trivial minorities arguing for either full deprecation or "considerations apply". ''Quillette'' is primarily a publication of opinion, and thus actual usage in articles will usually be a question of whether or not it is [[WP:DUE]] for an attributed opinion rather than whether it is reliable for a factual claim.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|quillette.com}}
|}