<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:RADIOFREEASIA
 | status		= gr
 | last			= 2022
 | domain1		= rfa.org

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 333#RfC: Radio Free Asia (RFA)|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2021

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Radio Free Asia}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
Radio Free Asia can be generally considered a reliable source. In particularly geopolitically charged areas, [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]] of its point of view and funding by the U.S. government may be appropriate. Per the result of a 2021 RfC, editors have established that there is little reason to think RFA demonstrates some systematic inaccuracy, unreliability, or level of government co-option that precludes its use.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Radio Free Asia]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Radio Free Asia|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#Views on International Campaign for Tibet, UNESCO, Tibet Post International/The Tibet Post, Tibet Watch, Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, Free Tibet, Radio Free Asia]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 329#Reliability of Radio Free Asia]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 341#Xinhua]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 391#Radio Free Asia]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 333#RfC: Radio Free Asia (RFA)|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Radio Free Asia"
| [[Radio Free Asia]] <small>(RFA)</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPRFA}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RADIOFREEASIA}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|333|RfC: Radio Free Asia (RFA)|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| Radio Free Asia can be generally considered a reliable source. In particularly geopolitically charged areas, [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]] of its point of view and funding by the U.S. government may be appropriate. Per the result of a 2021 RfC, editors have established that there is little reason to think RFA demonstrates some systematic inaccuracy, unreliability, or level of government co-option that precludes its use.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|rfa.org}}
|}