<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:RAWSTORY
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2021
 | domain1		= rawstory.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 324#RfC - The Raw Story|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2021

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Raw Story}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''Raw Story'' is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories. Editors almost unanimously agree that the source is [[WP:BIASED|biased]] and that [[WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV|in-text attribution]] should accompany each use of the source.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Raw Story]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Raw Story|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Raw Story]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 17#Raw Story]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112#The Raw Story]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 202#Raw Story]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#Raw story a RS for details on this obscure death?]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 324#RfC - The Raw Story|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Raw Story"
| {{anchor|The Raw Story}} ''[[Raw Story]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RAWSTORY}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|324|RfC - The Raw Story|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''Raw Story'' is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories. Editors almost unanimously agree that the source is [[WP:BIASED|biased]] and that [[WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV|in-text attribution]] should accompany each use of the source.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|rawstory.com}}
|}