{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:ROLLINGSTONECON
| status = gu
| last = 2021
| domain1 = council.rollingstone.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Rolling Stone|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2021
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Rolling Stone}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is unanimous consensus among editors that ''Culture Council'' articles (of URL form rollingstone.com/culture-council/*) are [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]] and are, in most aspects, equivalent to [[WP:FORBESCON|''Forbes''-]] and [[WP:RSP#HuffPost contributors|''HuffPost''-]]contributors. Editors, however, have also expressed concern that at least some of the content published is [[WP:PROMO|promotional]] and thus not usable. Editors should thus determine on a case-by-case basis whether the opinions published there are [[WP:IS|independent]] and also if they constitute [[WP:DUE|due weight]]. Usage of these sources for [[WP:THIRDPARTY|third-party claims]] in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] as well as [[WP:MEDRS|medical or scientific claims]] is not allowed.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Rolling Stone]]:}}
{{excerpt|Rolling Stone|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 326#Caution: Rolling Stone goes pay-for-play]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Rolling Stone|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Rolling Stone (Culture Council)"
| ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' (''Culture Council'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:ROLLINGSTONECON}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|353|Rolling Stone|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is unanimous consensus among editors that ''Culture Council'' articles (of URL form rollingstone.com/culture-council/*) are [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]] and are, in most aspects, equivalent to [[WP:FORBESCON|''Forbes''-]] and [[WP:RSP#HuffPost contributors|''HuffPost''-]]contributors. Editors, however, have also expressed concern that at least some of the content published is [[WP:PROMO|promotional]] and thus not usable. Editors should thus determine on a case-by-case basis whether the opinions published there are [[WP:IS|independent]] and also if they constitute [[WP:DUE|due weight]]. Usage of these sources for [[WP:THIRDPARTY|third-party claims]] in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] as well as [[WP:MEDRS|medical or scientific claims]] is not allowed.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|council.rollingstone.com|rollingstone.com/culture-council}}
|}