{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:ROLLINGSTONECULTURE
| status = gr
| last = 2021
| domain1 = rollingstone.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Rolling Stone|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2021
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Rolling Stone}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''Rolling Stone'' has generally reliable coverage on culture matters (i.e., films, music, entertainment, etc.). ''Rolling Stone'''s [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] and reviews, as well as any contentious statements regarding [[WP:BLP|living persons]], should only be used with [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]]. The publication's [[capsule reviews]] deserve [[WP:DUE|less weight]] than their full-length reviews, as they are subject to a lower standard of fact-checking. See also {{pslink|Rolling Stone (politics and society), 2011–present}}, {{pslink|Rolling Stone (Culture Council)}}.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Rolling Stone]]:}}
{{excerpt|Rolling Stone|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 17#Rolling Stone]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 26#Rolling Stone, NME, Popmatters and Metal-Observer]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#Rolling Stone review]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 82#Twitter, Rolling Stone magazine and The Guardian]]
==== Other ====
* [[WT:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 16#Glixel]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Rolling Stone|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Rolling Stone"
| ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' (culture) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:ROLLINGSTONE}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:ROLLINGSTONECULTURE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
|{{rsnl|353|Rolling Stone|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''Rolling Stone'' has generally reliable coverage on culture matters (i.e., films, music, entertainment, etc.). ''Rolling Stone'''s [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] and reviews, as well as any contentious statements regarding [[WP:BLP|living persons]], should only be used with [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]]. The publication's [[capsule reviews]] deserve [[WP:DUE|less weight]] than their full-length reviews, as they are subject to a lower standard of fact-checking. See also {{pslink|Rolling Stone (politics and society), 2011–present}}, {{pslink|Rolling Stone (Culture Council)}}.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|rollingstone.com}}
|}