{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = nc
| last = 2012
| domain1 = scienceblogs.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|ScienceBlogs}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
ScienceBlogs is an invitation-only network of blogs. There is no consensus on the reliability of ScienceBlogs articles in general. Most editors consider ScienceBlogs articles written by [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter experts]] reliable, though articles outside the writer's relevant field are not. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] it should not be used as a source of information on [[WP:BLPSPS|other living persons]]. Since it often covers [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] material, [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] may be relevant.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[ScienceBlogs]]:}}
{{excerpt|ScienceBlogs|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Guardian blog articles]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#Scienceblogs.com/Deltoid AKA timlambert.org is not a Reliable Source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77#Deep Sea News]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Journal of Cosmology]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113#Few body systems]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117#Blog posts and personal websites in the AAH article]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 133#PZ Myers on Stuart Pivar's Lifecode]]
==== Other ====
* [[Talk:Energy Catalyzer/Archive 10#'ScienceBlogs' article on the E-Cat]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2012|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="ScienceBlogs"
| [[ScienceBlogs]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Guardian blog articles|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#Scienceblogs.com/Deltoid AKA timlambert.org is not a Reliable Source|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77#Deep Sea News|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Journal of Cosmology|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113#Few body systems|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117#Blog posts and personal websites in the AAH article|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 133#PZ Myers on Stuart Pivar's Lifecode|7]]
[[Talk:Energy Catalyzer/Archive 10#'ScienceBlogs' article on the E-Cat|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2012}}
| ScienceBlogs is an invitation-only network of blogs. There is no consensus on the reliability of ScienceBlogs articles in general. Most editors consider ScienceBlogs articles written by [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter experts]] reliable, though articles outside the writer's relevant field are not. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] it should not be used as a source of information on [[WP:BLPSPS|other living persons]]. Since it often covers [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] material, [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] may be relevant.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|scienceblogs.com}}
|}