{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = gr | last = 2022 | domain1 = skepticalinquirer.org | rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|Rfc]] | rfcdate = 2022 }} {{WP:RSPIntro|Skeptical Inquirer}} __TOC__ == Summary == A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Skeptical Inquirer]]:}}
{{excerpt|Skeptical Inquirer|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364#Columns at Skeptical Inquirer]]
==== Other ==== * [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source]] === Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}} === Rfcs ===
# 2022 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|Rfc]] ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gr" id="Skeptical Inquirer" | ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]'' | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}} | {{rsnl|373|RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|2022|rfc=y}} | {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}} | A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources. | {{WP:RSPUSES|skepticalinquirer.org}} |}