{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2022
| domain1 = skepticalinquirer.org
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2022
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Skeptical Inquirer}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Skeptical Inquirer]]:}}
{{excerpt|Skeptical Inquirer|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364#Columns at Skeptical Inquirer]]
==== Other ====
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2022 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Skeptical Inquirer"
| ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|373|RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|2022|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|skepticalinquirer.org}}
|}