<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2024
 | domain1		= socialblade.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 442#RFC: Social media analytic websites (e.g. Social Blade)|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2024

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Social Blade}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
Editors consider Social Blade, a social media analytics website, reliable when it comes to objective statistics and data. This does not apply to the site's "grades", "rankings", and "estimated earnings" information, which have dubious methodologies. There is consensus that Social Blade is ineffective in determining notability as it is a primary source.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Social Blade]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Social Blade|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 350#Reliability of Social Blade]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 425#Is Social Blade a reliable source for YouTube statistics?]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2024|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2024 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 442#RFC: Social media analytic websites (e.g. Social Blade)|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Social Blade"
| [[Social Blade]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|442|RFC: Social media analytic websites (e.g. Social Blade)|2024|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024|stale=n}}
| Editors consider Social Blade, a social media analytics website, reliable when it comes to objective statistics and data. This does not apply to the site's "grades", "rankings", and "estimated earnings" information, which have dubious methodologies. There is consensus that Social Blade is ineffective in determining notability as it is a primary source.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|socialblade.com}}
|}