{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gu
| last = 2021
| domain1 = swarajyamag.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Swarajya (magazine)}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
Due to persistent abuse, ''Swarajya'' is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[Wikipedia talk:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. ''Swarajya'' is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] ''Swarajya''. Editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. ''Swarajya'' was formerly the parent publication of {{pslink|OpIndia}}, and frequently republishes content from OpIndia under the "Swarajya Staff" [[byline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|OpIndia}}.''
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Swarajya (magazine)]]:}}
{{excerpt|Swarajya (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#I searched for Swarajya magzine in archives or its reliability but cannot find either.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347#Laundering Swarajya and citing opinion articles]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-b" id="Swarajya"
| ''[[Swarajya (magazine)|Swarajya]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu|b=y}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#I searched for Swarajya magzine in archives or its reliability but cannot find either.|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347#Laundering Swarajya and citing opinion articles|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| Due to persistent abuse, ''Swarajya'' is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[Wikipedia talk:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. ''Swarajya'' is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] ''Swarajya''. Editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. ''Swarajya'' was formerly the parent publication of {{pslink|OpIndia}}, and frequently republishes content from OpIndia under the "Swarajya Staff" [[byline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|OpIndia}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|swarajyamag.com}}
|}