{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:TECHCRUNCH
| status = nc
| last = 2025
| domain1 = techcrunch.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|TechCrunch}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
Careful consideration should be given to whether a piece is written by staff or as a part of their blog, as well as whether the piece/writer may have a conflict of interest, and to what extent they rely on public relations material from their subject for their writing. TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying [[WP:V|verifiability]], though their articles often have too little independent analysis to satisfy [[WP:CORPDEPTH]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[TechCrunch]]:}}
{{excerpt|TechCrunch|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87#techcrunch.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Is TechCrunch a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2025|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="TechCrunch"
| [[TechCrunch]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:TECHCRUNCH}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87#techcrunch.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Is TechCrunch a reliable source?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| Careful consideration should be given to whether a piece is written by staff or as a part of their blog, as well as whether the piece/writer may have a conflict of interest, and to what extent they rely on public relations material from their subject for their writing. TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying [[WP:V|verifiability]], though their articles often have too little independent analysis to satisfy [[WP:CORPDEPTH]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|techcrunch.com}}
|}