{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = WP:CSMONITOR | status = gr | last = 2016 | domain1 = csmonitor.com }} {{WP:RSPIntro|The Christian Science Monitor}} __TOC__ == Summary == ''The Christian Science Monitor'' is considered generally reliable for news. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Christian Science Monitor]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Christian Science Monitor|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === === Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2016|table=no}} === Rfcs === ''No Rfcs for this source.'' ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gr" id="The Christian Science Monitor" | data-sort-value="Christian Science Monitor"| ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'' (''CSM'', ''CS Monitor'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:CSMONITOR}} | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}} | 20See these discussions of ''The Christian Science Monitor'': | {{WP:RSPLAST|2016}} | ''The Christian Science Monitor'' is considered generally reliable for news. | {{WP:RSPUSES|csmonitor.com}} |}