{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:DAILYDOT
| status = nc
| last = 2022
| domain1 = dailydot.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 390#RFC (The Daily Dot)|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2022
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Daily Dot}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is no consensus regarding the general reliability of ''The Daily Dot'', though it is considered fine for citing non-contentious claims of fact. Some editors have objected to its tone or consider it to be [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]; there is community consensus that attribution should be used in topics where the source is known to be biased or when the source is used to support contentious claims of fact. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] before citing it in an article.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Daily Dot]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Daily Dot|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2022 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 390#RFC (The Daily Dot)|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="The Daily Dot"
| data-sort-value="Daily Dot"| ''[[The Daily Dot]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:DAILYDOT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|390|RFC (The Daily Dot)|2022|rfc=yes}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| There is no consensus regarding the general reliability of ''The Daily Dot'', though it is considered fine for citing non-contentious claims of fact. Some editors have objected to its tone or consider it to be [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]; there is community consensus that attribution should be used in topics where the source is known to be biased or when the source is used to support contentious claims of fact. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] before citing it in an article.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|dailydot.com}}
|}