{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gu
| last = 2024
| domain1 = dorchesterreview.ca
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 446#RfC: The Dorchester Review|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2024
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Dorchester Review}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus ''The Dorchester Review'' is generally unreliable, as it is not peer reviewed by the wider academic community. It has a poor reputation for fact-checking and lacks an editorial team. The source may still be used in some circumstances e.g. for uncontroversial self-descriptions, and content authored by established subject-matter experts.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Dorchester Review]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Dorchester Review|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2024|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2024 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 446#RfC: The Dorchester Review|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="The Dorchester Review"
| data-sort-value="Dorchester Review" | ''[[The Dorchester Review]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|446|RfC: The Dorchester Review|2024|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024|stale=n}}
| There is consensus ''The Dorchester Review'' is generally unreliable, as it is not peer reviewed by the wider academic community. It has a poor reputation for fact-checking and lacks an editorial team. The source may still be used in some circumstances e.g. for uncontroversial self-descriptions, and content authored by established subject-matter experts.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|dorchesterreview.ca}}
|}