{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = nc
| last = 2020
| domain1 = thegreenpapers.com
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290#RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|RfC]]
| rfcdate = 2020
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Green Papers}}
== Summary ==
There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Green Papers]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Green Papers|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== RSN ===
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 206#The Green Papers]]
=== Other ===
* [[Talk:2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses/Archive 1#Poll: Should The Green Papers estimates for pledged delegates be used in place of those from major sources like the New York Times?]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
# 2020 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290#RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|RfC]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="The Green Papers"
| data-sort-value="Green Papers" | ''[[The Green Papers]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|290|RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thegreenpapers.com}}
|}