{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = nc | last = 2020 | domain1 = thegreenpapers.com | rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290#RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|Rfc]] | rfcdate = 2020 }} {{WP:RSPIntro|The Green Papers}} __TOC__ == Summary == There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Green Papers]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Green Papers|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === ==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 206#The Green Papers]]
==== Other ==== * [[Talk:2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses/Archive 1#Poll: Should The Green Papers estimates for pledged delegates be used in place of those from major sources like the New York Times?]] === Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}} === Rfcs ===
# 2020 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290#RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|Rfc]] ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-nc" id="The Green Papers" | data-sort-value="Green Papers" | ''[[The Green Papers]]'' | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}} | {{rsnl|290|RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|2020|rfc=y}} | {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}} | There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight. | {{WP:RSPUSES|thegreenpapers.com}} |}