{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2020
| domain1 = theintercept.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Intercept}}
== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''The Intercept'' is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider ''The Intercept'' a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]], so uses may need to be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. For science, editors prefer [[Scholarly peer review|peer-reviewed journals]] over news sources like ''The Intercept''.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Intercept]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Intercept|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== RSN ===
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#The Intercept as a source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272#The Intercept]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 302#The Intercept and politics]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315#The Intercept (non-staff articles)]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
''No RfCs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Intercept"
| data-sort-value="Intercept" | ''[[The Intercept]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#The Intercept as a source|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272#The Intercept|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 302#The Intercept and politics|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315#The Intercept (non-staff articles)|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is consensus that ''The Intercept'' is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider ''The Intercept'' a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]], so uses may need to be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. For science, editors prefer [[Scholarly peer review|peer-reviewed journals]] over news sources like ''The Intercept''.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|theintercept.com}}
|}