{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:THENATION
| status = gr
| last = 2022
| domain1 = thenation.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Nation}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''The Nation'' is generally reliable. In the "About" section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider ''The Nation'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] whose statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The publication's [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from ''The Nation'' constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] in the article and conforms to the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Nation]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Nation|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9#The Nation article re: Daniel Pipes]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#Further Discussion of the Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Article about William Timmons in The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#Is The Nation a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 305#Is The Nation reliable for claims about the Douma Chemical attack?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371#The nation]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Nation"
| data-sort-value="Nation"| ''[[The Nation]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:THENATION}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#The Nation|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9#The Nation article re: Daniel Pipes|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#Further Discussion of the Nation|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Article about William Timmons in The Nation|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#Is The Nation a reliable source?|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#The Nation|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#The Nation|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 305#Is The Nation reliable for claims about the Douma Chemical attack?|8]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371#The nation|9]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| There is consensus that ''The Nation'' is generally reliable. In the "About" section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider ''The Nation'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] whose statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The publication's [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from ''The Nation'' constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] in the article and conforms to the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thenation.com}}
|}