{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:WAPO
| status = gr
| last = 2024
| domain1 = washingtonpost.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|The Washington Post}}
== Summary ==
Most editors consider ''The Washington Post'' generally reliable. Some editors note that [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] should be used to evaluate blog posts on ''The Washington Post'''s website.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[The Washington Post]]:}}
{{excerpt|The Washington Post|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2024|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
''No RfCs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Washington Post"
| data-sort-value="Washington Post" | ''[[The Washington Post]]'' (''The Post'', ''WaPo'', ''TWP'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WAPO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| 20{{efn|See these discussions of ''The Washington Post'':
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| Most editors consider ''The Washington Post'' generally reliable. Some editors note that [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] should be used to evaluate blog posts on ''The Washington Post'''s website.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|washingtonpost.com}}
|}