<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2025
 | domain1		= timesnow.com

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Times Now}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
Additional considerations apply to topics related to Indian politics or Hindu nationalism due to lack of reliability in this area. Most editors determined Times Now to be generally reliable aside from this while some raised additional concerns over editorial standards and political bias.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Times Now]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Times Now|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_496#RfC:_Times_Now]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_331#Survey_(Asian_News_International)]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_424#Unreliable_sources?_FirstPost_/TimeNow]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_246#List_of_Reliable_Sources]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2025|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
</div>
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Times Now"
| [[Times Now]] 
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_496#RfC:_Times_Now|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_331#Survey_(Asian_News_International)|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_424#Unreliable_sources?_FirstPost_/TimeNow|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive_246#List_of_Reliable_Sources|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| Additional considerations apply to topics related to Indian politics or Hindu nationalism due to lack of reliability in this area. Most editors determined Times Now to be generally reliable aside from this while some raised additional concerns over editorial standards and political bias. 
| {{WP:RSPUSES|timesnow.com}}
|}