{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = nc
| last = 2018
| domain1 = townhall.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Townhall}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
As of 2010, a few editors commented that opinion pieces in Townhall are reliable as a source for the opinion of the author of the individual piece, although they may not be reliable for [[WP:INTEXT|unattributed]] statements of fact, and context will dictate whether the opinion of the author as such, meets the standard of [[WP:DUEWEIGHT]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Townhall]]:}}
{{excerpt|Townhall|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23#http://townhall.com/]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 69#Is Townhall.com a reliable source for proving opposing opinions?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Why Townhall is not a RS]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Townhall"
| [[Townhall]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23#http://townhall.com/|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 69#Is Townhall.com a reliable source for proving opposing opinions?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Why Townhall is not a RS|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| As of 2010, a few editors commented that opinion pieces in Townhall are reliable as a source for the opinion of the author of the individual piece, although they may not be reliable for [[WP:INTEXT|unattributed]] statements of fact, and context will dictate whether the opinion of the author as such, meets the standard of [[WP:DUEWEIGHT]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|townhall.com}}
|}