{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:VARIETY
| status = gr
| last = 2016
| domain1 = variety.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Variety (magazine)}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
As an entertainment trade magazine, ''Variety'' is considered a reliable source in its field.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Variety (magazine)]]:}}
{{excerpt|Variety (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Variety on Dragon Ball Z]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Are Variety and The Hollywood Reporter reliable sources for film reviews?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 29#Tucker Max and questions about 2 sources]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 160#imdb as a source for credits]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 207#Forbes article by credible contributor]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2016|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Variety"
| ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:VARIETY}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Variety on Dragon Ball Z|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Are Variety and The Hollywood Reporter reliable sources for film reviews?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 29#Tucker Max and questions about 2 sources|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 160#imdb as a source for credits|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 207#Forbes article by credible contributor|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2016}}
| As an entertainment trade magazine, ''Variety'' is considered a reliable source in its field.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|variety.com}}
|}