<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:VENEZUELANALYSIS
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2023
 | domain1		= venezuelanalysis.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#RfC: Venezuelanalysis|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2019

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Venezuelanalysis}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is consensus that Venezuelanalysis is generally unreliable. Some editors consider Venezuelanalysis a [[Bolivarian propaganda]] outlet, and most editors question its accuracy and editorial oversight. Almost all editors describe the site as [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its claims should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Venezuelanalysis]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Venezuelanalysis|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 55#Venezuelanalysis]]

</div>

==== Other ====

* [[Talk:Hugo Chávez/Archive 19#Sources]]
* [[Talk:Hugo Chávez/Archive 29#Venezuelanalysis.com not WP:RS]]
=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2023|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2019 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#RfC: Venezuelanalysis|Rfc]]

# 2023 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 420#RfC: Venezuelanalysis|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Venezuelanalysis"
| [[Venezuelanalysis]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:VENEZUELANALYSIS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|262|RfC: Venezuelanalysis|2019|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|420|RfC: Venezuelanalysis|2023|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023|stale=n}}
| There is consensus that Venezuelanalysis is generally unreliable. Some editors consider Venezuelanalysis a [[Bolivarian propaganda]] outlet, and most editors question its accuracy and editorial oversight. Almost all editors describe the site as [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its claims should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|venezuelanalysis.com}}
|}