<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:VENTUREBEAT
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2025
 | domain1		= venturebeat.com

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|VentureBeat}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of [[churnalism]] and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. WikiProject Video games has [[WP:VG/S#General gaming|classified VentureBeat]] as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[VentureBeat]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|VentureBeat|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#VentureBeat]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 482#Reevaluating VentureBeat: Churnalism, notability and AI use]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider]]

</div>

==== Other ====

* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 12#Venturebeat/Gamesbeat]]
=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2025|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
</div>
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="VentureBeat"
| [[VentureBeat]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:VENTUREBEAT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#VentureBeat|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 482#Reevaluating VentureBeat: Churnalism, notability and AI use|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider|3]]<br> [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 12#Venturebeat/Gamesbeat|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of [[churnalism]] and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. WikiProject Video games has [[WP:VG/S#General gaming|classified VentureBeat]] as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|venturebeat.com}}
|}