{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut = WP:VOGUE
| status = gr
| last = 2018
| domain1 = vogue.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Vogue (magazine)}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
''Vogue'' is considered generally reliable. Potentially contentious statements made by ''Vogue'' interview subjects can be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]] to the individual.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Vogue (magazine)]]:}}
{{excerpt|Vogue (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Problematic source on Hak Ja Han]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 81#Sources with Quotes]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Quote in News Article as a Source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 237#It's time to talk about biography.com generally]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Vogue"
| ''[[Vogue (magazine)|Vogue]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:VOGUE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Problematic source on Hak Ja Han|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 81#Sources with Quotes|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Quote in News Article as a Source|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 237#It's time to talk about biography.com generally|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| ''Vogue'' is considered generally reliable. Potentially contentious statements made by ''Vogue'' interview subjects can be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]] to the individual.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|vogue.com}}
|}