<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:WASHINGTONEXAMINER
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2020
 | domain1		= washingtonexaminer.com

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Washington Examiner}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Washington Examiner'', but there is consensus that it should not be used to substantiate [[WP:EXCEPTIONAL|exceptional claims]]. Almost all editors consider the ''Washington Examiner'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] and believe that statements from this publication should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The ''Washington Examiner'' publishes [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion columns]], which should be handled by following the appropriate guideline.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Washington Examiner]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Washington Examiner|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#Reliability of the Washington Examiner]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#Washington Examiner]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#Erick Erickson and The Washington Examiner]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192#Washington Examiner op-eds]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Washington Examiner]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Sources at Media bias in the United States for claims of censorship of conservative content]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#Newsbusters and The Washington Examiner as sources for facts in the lead of CNN]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Washington Examiner on John McAfee]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2020|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
</div>
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Washington Examiner"
| ''[[Washington Examiner]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WASHINGTONEXAMINER}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#Reliability of the Washington Examiner|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#Washington Examiner|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#Erick Erickson and The Washington Examiner|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192#Washington Examiner op-eds|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#Washington Examiner|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Sources at Media bias in the United States for claims of censorship of conservative content|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#Newsbusters and The Washington Examiner as sources for facts in the lead of CNN|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Washington Examiner on John McAfee|8]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of the ''Washington Examiner'', but there is consensus that it should not be used to substantiate [[WP:EXCEPTIONAL|exceptional claims]]. Almost all editors consider the ''Washington Examiner'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] and believe that statements from this publication should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The ''Washington Examiner'' publishes [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion columns]], which should be handled by following the appropriate guideline.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|washingtonexaminer.com}}
|}