{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2025
| domain1 = wired.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Wired (magazine)}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
''Wired'' magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Wired (magazine)]]:}}
{{excerpt|Wired (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#leaked documents?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#Wired.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#wired.com and whosnews.usaweekend.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Wired 1998]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Wired magazine story and insistence by editors to follow apparent misrepresentation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Wired re: time travel]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489#WIRED admitting to publishing stories without fact checking them, knowingly doesn't publish a retraction until outed months after the fact]]
==== Other ====
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 4#Wired]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2025|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Wired"
| ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' (''[[Wired UK]]'')
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#leaked documents?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#Wired.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#wired.com and whosnews.usaweekend.com|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Wired 1998|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Wired magazine story and insistence by editors to follow apparent misrepresentation|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Wired re: time travel|6]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489#WIRED admitting to publishing stories without fact checking them, knowingly doesn't publish a retraction until outed months after the fact|7]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 4#Wired|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| ''Wired'' magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wired.com|wired.co.uk}}
|}