<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|d|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:WND
 | status		= d
 | last			= 2018
 | domain1		= wnd.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#RfC: WorldNetDaily|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2018

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|WorldNetDaily}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
''WorldNetDaily'' was deprecated in the 2018 RfC. There is clear consensus that ''WorldNetDaily'' is not a reliable source, and that it should not be used because of its particularly poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and [[conspiracy theories]]. Most editors consider ''WorldNetDaily'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]]. ''WorldNetDaily''<nowiki />'s [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]] should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher, and the citation should preferably point to the original publisher.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[WorldNetDaily]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|WorldNetDaily|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===


=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2018 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253#RfC: WorldNetDaily|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="WorldNetDaily"
| ''[[WorldNetDaily]]'' <small>(''WND'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WND}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|253|RfC: WorldNetDaily|2018|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018|stale=n}}
| ''WorldNetDaily'' was deprecated in the 2018 RfC. There is clear consensus that ''WorldNetDaily'' is not a reliable source, and that it should not be used because of its particularly poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and [[conspiracy theories]]. Most editors consider ''WorldNetDaily'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]]. ''WorldNetDaily''<nowiki />'s [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]] should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher, and the citation should preferably point to the original publisher.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wnd.com|worldnetdaily.com}}
|}