<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2021
 | domain1		= xbiz.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#RfC: Adult industry sources|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2021

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|XBIZ}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
''XBIZ'' is considered generally reliable for the adult industry. However, it publishes press releases/sponsored content without clearly delineating the distinction between their own journalism and the promotional content of others. Thus, editors should take care that the source is not used for content obviously or likely to be promotional.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[XBIZ]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|XBIZ|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===


=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2021 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#RfC: Adult industry sources|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="XBIZ"
| data-sort-value="XBIZ"| [[XBIZ]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|349|RfC: Adult industry sources|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| ''XBIZ'' is considered generally reliable for the adult industry. However, it publishes press releases/sponsored content without clearly delineating the distinction between their own journalism and the promotional content of others. Thus, editors should take care that the source is not used for content obviously or likely to be promotional.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|xbiz.com}}
|}