{{Infobox
| title = [[Acclaimed Music]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21#Acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50#acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Can Acclaimed Music be used to cite individual review scores?]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 41#Reliability of acclaimedmusic.net]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Acclaimed Music, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Acclaimed Music"
| [[Acclaimed Music]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21#Acclaimedmusic.net|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50#acclaimedmusic.net|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#acclaimedmusic.net|3]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Can Acclaimed Music be used to cite individual review scores?|4]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 41#Reliability of acclaimedmusic.net|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022|stale=n}}
| Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|acclaimedmusic.net}}
|}