<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:ADLHSD}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Anti-Defamation League''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Anti-Defamation League]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = ADL
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

There is consensus that, outside the context of the [[Israeli–Palestinian conflict]], the ADL is generally a reliable source, particularly for topics related to [[hate group]]s and [[extremism]] in the U.S. There is no consensus that the ADL must always be attributed, but there is consensus that its labelling of organisations and individuals (especially as [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]]) should be attributed. Some editors regard the ADL's opinion pieces as unreliable and should only be used with attribution. In the 2024 RfC, there was rough consensus that the [[List of symbols designated by the Anti-Defamation League as hate symbols|ADL's hate symbol]] database is reliable for identifying the existence of a symbol and for straightforward descriptive facts, but not for more complex details such as a symbol's history. In such cases, [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]] to the ADL may be advisable. ''See also: [[#Anti-Defamation League (antisemitism)|Anti-Defamation League (antisemitism, excluding Israel or Zionism)]] and [[#Anti-Defamation League (Israel/Palestine conflict)|Anti-Defamation League (Israeli–Palestinian conflict, including related antisemitism)]]''

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9#Are these reliable sources and do they conflict with NPOV?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#Anti-Defamation League]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 147#ADL website as source on noncontroversial facts]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 204#And the ADL]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 234#ADL is being cited as a reliable source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336#adl.org/blog (Anti-Defamation League Blog)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 434#Is it time to re-evaluate the ADL?]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 490#ADL removing content, following criticism on social media]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Anti-Defamation League, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Anti-Defamation League"
| [[Anti-Defamation League]] <small>(ADL)</small> (excluding the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and Zionism) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPADL}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:ADLHSD}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|302|RfC: Anti-Defamation League (ADL)|2020|rfc=yes}} {{rsnl|439|RFC: The Anti-Defamation League|2024|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| There is consensus that, outside the context of the [[Israeli–Palestinian conflict]], the ADL is generally a reliable source, particularly for topics related to [[hate group]]s and [[extremism]] in the U.S. There is no consensus that the ADL must always be attributed, but there is consensus that its labelling of organisations and individuals (especially as [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]]) should be attributed. Some editors regard the ADL's opinion pieces as unreliable and should only be used with attribution. In the 2024 RfC, there was rough consensus that the [[List of symbols designated by the Anti-Defamation League as hate symbols|ADL's hate symbol]] database is reliable for identifying the existence of a symbol and for straightforward descriptive facts, but not for more complex details such as a symbol's history. In such cases, [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]] to the ADL may be advisable. ''See also: [[#Anti-Defamation League (antisemitism)|Anti-Defamation League (antisemitism, excluding Israel or Zionism)]] and [[#Anti-Defamation League (Israel/Palestine conflict)|Anti-Defamation League (Israeli–Palestinian conflict, including related antisemitism)]]''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|adl.org|adl.org/resources/hate-symbols/search}}
|}