{{Shortcut|WP:ARSTECHNICA}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Ars Technica]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
''Ars Technica'' is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ars Technica news?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Ars Technica a Reliable Source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371# RS for Board Games- Board Game Quest, Ars Technica, Kotaku and TechRaptor]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ars Technica, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Ars Technica"
| ''[[Ars Technica]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:ARSTECHNICA}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ars Technica news?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Ars Technica a Reliable Source?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371# RS for Board Games- Board Game Quest, Ars Technica, Kotaku and TechRaptor|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| ''Ars Technica'' is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|arstechnica.com|arstechnica.co.uk}}
|}