{{Shortcut|WP:BELLINGCAT}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Bellingcat]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that Bellingcat is generally reliable for news and should preferably be used with [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]]. Some editors consider Bellingcat a [[WP:BIASED|biased]] source.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#"Bellingcat"]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193#Bellingcat]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Bellingcat used for this]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 275#Bellingcat]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 330#Bellingcat]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 338#Is this Bellingcat article reliable for this specific BLP claim?]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bellingcat, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Bellingcat"
| [[Bellingcat]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BELLINGCAT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|274|RfC: Bellingcat (August 2019)|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021|stale=y}}
| There is consensus that Bellingcat is generally reliable for news and should preferably be used with [[WP:INTEXT|attribution]]. Some editors consider Bellingcat a [[WP:BIASED|biased]] source.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|bellingcat.com}}
|}