<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:BROADWAYWORLD}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''BroadwayWorld''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[BroadwayWorld]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

''BroadwayWorld'' is considered generally unreliable, as it contains many articles that reproduce press releases, disguising this as authentic journalism. As the site has limited editorial oversight, and the true author of the content of press releases is obscured, this website should generally not be used for facts about [[WP:BLP|living persons]].

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 203#BroadwayWorld.com?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364#List of under-discussed websites: do they fit RS standards?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 394#Broadway World]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398#Concern regarding Broadway World]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:BroadwayWorld, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="BroadwayWorld"
| ''[[BroadwayWorld]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BROADWAYWORLD}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 203#BroadwayWorld.com?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364#List of under-discussed websites: do they fit RS standards?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 394#Broadway World|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398#Concern regarding Broadway World|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| ''BroadwayWorld'' is considered generally unreliable, as it contains many articles that reproduce press releases, disguising this as authentic journalism. As the site has limited editorial oversight, and the true author of the content of press releases is obscured, this website should generally not be used for facts about [[WP:BLP|living persons]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|broadwayworld.com}}
|}