{{Shortcut|WP:BUZZFEED}} {{Infobox | title = [[BuzzFeed]] | image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)'' | label2 = source type | data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)'' | label3 = publisher | data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)'' | label5 = website | data5 = | label6 = classification | data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply }} Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent. Respondents to a 2014 survey from the {{pslink|Pew Research Center}} on news sources in America ranked BuzzFeed at the bottom of the list.{{cite news|accessdate=October 23, 2018|title=Media Sources: Distinct Favorites Emerge on the Left and Right|url=http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/|website=Pew Research Center|date=October 21, 2014|first1=Amy|last1=Mitchell|first2=Jeffrey|last2=Gottfried|first3=Jocelyn|last3=Kiley|first4=Katerina Eva|last4=Matsa|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181020233211/http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/|archive-date=October 20, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} BuzzFeed may use [[A/B testing]] for new articles, which may cause article content to change.{{cite news|accessdate=October 23, 2018|title=BuzzFeed's strategy for getting content to do well on all platforms? Adaptation and a lot of A/B testing|url=http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/buzzfeeds-strategy-for-getting-content-to-do-well-on-all-platforms-adaptation-and-a-lot-of-ab-testing/|newspaper=Nieman Lab|date=September 15, 2017|first=Shan|last=Wang|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181121160312/http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/buzzfeeds-strategy-for-getting-content-to-do-well-on-all-platforms-adaptation-and-a-lot-of-ab-testing/|archive-date=November 21, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} BuzzFeed operated a separate news division, ''BuzzFeed News'', which had higher editorial standards and was hosted on a different website. ''See also: {{pslink|BuzzFeed News}}.'' == Prior discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 93#BuzzFeed]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179#BuzzFeed]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189#May Buzzfeed sometimes be an RS? (Article about Chris Epps)]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#Buzzfeed]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Beware BuzzFeed articles for at least a day after publication]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232#BuzzFeed and Amazon.com]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245#BuzzFeed (yes, I know – again)]] * [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 419#Additional content from BuzzFeed appearing on BuzzFeed News]] * Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD''' {{DEFAULTSORT:BuzzFeed, Perennial sources}} ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-nc" id="BuzzFeed" | [[BuzzFeed]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BUZZFEED}} | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}} | [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 93#BuzzFeed|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179#BuzzFeed|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189#May Buzzfeed sometimes be an RS? (Article about Chris Epps)|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 213#Buzzfeed|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231#Beware BuzzFeed articles for at least a day after publication|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232#BuzzFeed and Amazon.com|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245#BuzzFeed (yes, I know – again)|8]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 419#Additional content from BuzzFeed appearing on BuzzFeed News|9]] | {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}} | Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent. Respondents to a 2014 survey from the {{pslink|Pew Research Center}} on news sources in America ranked BuzzFeed at the bottom of the list.{{cite news|accessdate=October 23, 2018|title=Media Sources: Distinct Favorites Emerge on the Left and Right|url=http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/|website=Pew Research Center|date=October 21, 2014|first1=Amy|last1=Mitchell|first2=Jeffrey|last2=Gottfried|first3=Jocelyn|last3=Kiley|first4=Katerina Eva|last4=Matsa|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181020233211/http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-1-media-sources-distinct-favorites-emerge-on-the-left-and-right/|archive-date=October 20, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} BuzzFeed may use [[A/B testing]] for new articles, which may cause article content to change.{{cite news|accessdate=October 23, 2018|title=BuzzFeed's strategy for getting content to do well on all platforms? Adaptation and a lot of A/B testing|url=http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/buzzfeeds-strategy-for-getting-content-to-do-well-on-all-platforms-adaptation-and-a-lot-of-ab-testing/|newspaper=Nieman Lab|date=September 15, 2017|first=Shan|last=Wang|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181121160312/http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/buzzfeeds-strategy-for-getting-content-to-do-well-on-all-platforms-adaptation-and-a-lot-of-ab-testing/|archive-date=November 21, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}} BuzzFeed operated a separate news division, ''BuzzFeed News'', which had higher editorial standards and was hosted on a different website. ''See also: {{pslink|BuzzFeed News}}.'' | {{WP:RSPUSES|buzzfeed.com}} |}