<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:CLIMATEFEEDBACK}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Climate Feedback''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Climate Feedback]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

Climate Feedback is a [[fact-checking]] website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to [[climate change]]. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the {{pslink|International Fact-Checking Network}}, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] due to its high reviewer requirements.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 250#Are we allowed to cite climate scientists?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 252#Climatefeedback.org (a climate science fact-checking website)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Factcheck from climatefeedback.org as a source at Guus Berkhout]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284#Climate Feedback and similar blog sources being treated differently?]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Climate Feedback, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Climate Feedback"
| [[Climate Feedback]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:CLIMATEFEEDBACK}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 250#Are we allowed to cite climate scientists?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 252#Climatefeedback.org (a climate science fact-checking website)|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Factcheck from climatefeedback.org as a source at Guus Berkhout|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284#Climate Feedback and similar blog sources being treated differently?|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| Climate Feedback is a [[fact-checking]] website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to [[climate change]]. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the {{pslink|International Fact-Checking Network}}, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] due to its high reviewer requirements.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|climatefeedback.org}}
|}