{{Shortcut|WP:CODA}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Coda Media]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = Coda Story
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
A 2021 RfC found consensus that Coda Media is generally reliable for factual reporting. A few editors consider Coda Media a [[WP:BIASED|biased]] source for international politics related to the U.S., as it has received funding from the [[National Endowment for Democracy]], though not to the extent that it affects reliability.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Coda Media, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Coda Media"
| [[Coda Media]] (Coda Story) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:CODA}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|337|RfC: Coda Story|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021|stale=y}}
| A 2021 RfC found consensus that Coda Media is generally reliable for factual reporting. A few editors consider Coda Media a [[WP:BIASED|biased]] source for international politics related to the U.S., as it has received funding from the [[National Endowment for Democracy]], though not to the extent that it affects reliability.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|codastory.com}}
|}